Shadia Fayne Wood, Tar Sands Action via Flickr/CC BY 2.
Only a couple of short days ago, Leader Obama introduced he would delay any decision around the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline until 2013. It had been heralded like a victory for environmentalists and artful protest. But that victory might be short-resided. Associates are convinced that the leader might be near collapsing to Republican demands--again.
This time around, the leader might permit the GOP to strong-arm him into accepting a provision that will problem immediate approval from the pipeline a provision added to the unrelated payroll tax cut bill like a 'rider'.
We reported the 2009 week that Republicans, brought by John Boehner, had rammed the Keystone provision through home of Reps. I noted this move was the effect of a decidedly undemocratic collaboration between Large Oil and it is favorite donees within the GOP. Well, everything oily campaign cash has compensated off, it appears like--we stand near seeing the Keystone XL approved right under our noses, despite a lengthy, passionate summer time of protest from regular People in america. When I authored earlier, this isn't what democracy appears like.
Remember, the country's top climate researcher, NASA's James Hansen, has stated when this pipeline qualifies, it's "game over for that climate".
Tar Sands Action has released a phone call to arms on its Facebook page:
This can be a red-colored alert.
Leader Obama may be caving on Keystone XL. We have in all probability a couple of short hrs to convince him to keep strong. 1000's of individuals are flowing in calls towards the Whitened House at this time, and we are dusting off intends to visit Obama 2012 offices too. Can you devote a phone call towards the Whitened House to inform them you anticipate the Leader to veto any bill that forces construction of Keystone XL
Here's their number: 202-456-1111
Let us roll.
350.org has more information on the best way to help, along with a script available if you want to call the president's office to convey your concerns.
No comments:
Post a Comment