Curious to discover the potential thinking behind Hewlett packard s recent actions, we started to check out the parallels in past behavior by tech giant Hewlett packard. Probably the most interesting example originates from VoodooPC, among the first high-finish gaming Computers for that store bought. Brought by Rahul Sood, Hewlett packard bought VoodooPC in 2006 and also the last product to leave that branch was released last year.
In a nutshell, we desired to determine if Hewlett packard really was where plans visit die.
Mr. Sood was kind enough to reply to a couple of questions.
TC: We at TC happen to be speaking about how exactly great VoodooPC was. All of us loved the hardware and that i remember unpacking the boxes and hearing the drums. It had been consumer done correctly. I additionally think you will find lots of parallels between Voodoo and Palm within this situation. Would you agree
Rahul Sood: I appreciate the type words, and that i know my buddies at Hewlett packard will even appreciate them also. Let s just say should you re will make a proper acquisition, regardless of how large, you must have persistence to combine cultures and permit the businesses to mutually flourish.
This is been under annually since i have left Hewlett packard contributing to 12 months because the Palm acquisition was introduced. Twelve months goes rapidly inside a large organization. It requires an average joe 8 several weeks to aboard themselves right into a new organization.
I believe these purchases ought to be protected by individuals who can effectively blend cultures and who are able to curate an image that individuals can rally around. and i really like persistence Should you do not have persistence you risk coming in the strategy.
Yes you will find lots of parallels between Palm and Voodoo that may be attracted. If future Rahul could return to 2006 Rahul I'd possess some helpful advice for him but surprisingly I still would have undergone using the deal, however i might have handled it in a different way.
TC: What might have Hewlett packard completed to save the Touch pad Anything
RS: I've found it interesting the Touch pad went from the total failure to selling out simply by altering the cost. It proves that there's an industry, approximately $100-$300 with this product. Additionally, it raises some rudimentary business rules that return to the times of Sun Tzu
When strong, prevent them. If of high morale, depress them. Appear humble to fill all of them with conceit. If comfortable, exhaust them. If u . s ., separate them. Attack their weak points. Emerge for their surprise.
Within the situation from the Touch pad Hewlett packard attempted to visit face to face with Apple, most likely not the best approach, especially given that they released it if this wasn t fully baked. In either case, you shouldn't go face to face with Apple, there s you don't need to.
They might disrupt the marketplace in a lower cost to achieve significant adoption of webOS, after which work to construct some back-finish recurring revenue via programs, close ties, search, shopping, etc.
They might eventually arrive the warmth and scale the company by open sourcing webOS and creating a solid application model that suits their enterprise clients.
There s lots of ways the Touch pad might have be a success however it needs time to work, persistence and vision to find it.
TC: Where's Hewlett packard headed Have you got any idea Can they go the IBM route
RS: By IBM route I suppose you re evaluating Hewlett packard PSG to Lenovo (or what was previously IBM s PC business). I disagree with this particular broadly cited comparison.
Hewlett packard PSG is a huge by having an insanely large footprint. Their greatest strength is the amount of ports they've on the market The planet needs hardware to earn money on software. There's no bigger hardware company than Hewlett packard. If perhaps they might better leverage their footprint inside a significant way they d be almost easy.
Therefore if they had opted the IBM route Hewlett packard risks missing the winning formula of IBM plus they could finish up failing to remember concerning the consumer and concentrating on the enterprise. For me serving the enterprise is really a classic school thought process.
Companies should focus on people, and also the enterprise follows, because real people run the enterprise. RIM is getting trouble since the competitor that displaced them is serving real people.. not Wall Street not the enterprise.
I additionally think it is telling that the officer of the organization was cited on CNBC yesterday saying, Hewlett packard s board of company directors can make the ultimate decision within the welfare in our investors . In my opinion should you build beautiful items that excite your clients then investors may ultimately benefit. In my opinion should you focus on investors then clients are affected.
If you request me where Hewlett packard is heading, I'd let you know pay attention to exactly what the leaders say and then try to seem sensible from it. I believe they've giant problems to resolve, plenty of complex internal issues, so when you re under stress you sometimes overlook things.
TC: This is amazingly frustrating to determine good items quit the ghost. How have you experience Voodoo Would you miss the company
RS: I have a Voodoo tatt on my small leg. I've Voodoo branding throughout home. Voodoo will invariably take part in me, back in the day an enormous a part of Hewlett packard s strategy and that i can t help but feel below par about this. Yeah I miss the company, the folks, the culture. however i made the best decision to maneuver on, I had been too psychologically mounted on it. I really like Microsoft s entertainment business, this is this type of fun spot to work. It jogs my memory of Voodoo in lots of ways.
TC: Exactly what does a business have to be effective in branding and consumer sales
RS: A business must know who they really are and where they originated from. They require leaders who dream of their items and encounters creating the vision with individuals who dream of rows and posts supporting them. They have to begin a obvious vision and strategy that individuals understand and may rally around.
They ought to live, eat, breath, sleep the company plus they naturally become evangelists for this. The effective brands begin a soul, the company turns into a living breathing entity inside the DNA from the organization.
Additionally they need great people. The the best Finding and retaining these folks is tough especially when you're within the Valley. Never has there have you been a much better time for awesome start-ups to have their juice. The acceleration for growth on tech start-ups is really clever that people re seeing companies range from to 100s of millions or billions in valuation in under five years. This is unbelievable.
Therefore the talent pool for nice Tech DNA gets more compact and more compact and also the Valley is regarded as the competitive area on the planet for bringing in and retaining great talent. Consider it, you ve got Facebook, Google, Apple, Zynga, then you definitely ve got companies who haven t upgraded their facility in decades. Like a college grad you can turn to Facebook or Google and operate in an attractive inspiring atmosphere this is tough to compete.
As companies mature, people start looking elsewhere to grow their horizons. HR and Prospecting might be probably the most important proper functions associated with a business within the tech space .but in some instances they're most likely the region that will get minimal investment since they're setup using the wrong charter.
For this reason I've found Microsoft fascinating. Microsoft may be the earliest, most established tech company, they've done a fantastic job of maintaining using the occasions. You can examine out our facility in Dallas This is pretty sick
TC: Are you able to buy Palm and run it for people You've that type of cash, right
RS: I believe Hewlett packard should free webOS. I believe the vision of splitting up Hewlett packard is cloudy at best. Used to do request Hewlett packard many occasions to market Voodoo to me, even emerged with a few plans. When they open acquired webOS and provided back Voodoo only then do we may have something. Maybe Arrington can pull some strings and that we will go into business together
I must finish by stating that Hewlett packard treated me using the utmost respect. I had been super stoked whenever we were building awesome items like Voodoo ENVY and Hewlett packard Blackbird and assisting to shape Hewlett packard s overall strategy. I had been sad to depart the organization, however i remained with little choice. I m happy where I'm now. Microsoft s entertainment clients are this type of awesome spot to work I am talking about really awesome.
I'd encourage your visitors to check on my latest publish on Hewlett packard, I m likely to write a number of them within the next week approximately.
No comments:
Post a Comment